PDF READ Dialogues With Marcel Duchamp Da Capo Paperback
The art of no interest However
SOME ARTISTIC TERMS ARE OF EXTREME artistic terms are of extreme Like The Ones Like the ones mentioned earlier Wonderful low key book that shows DuChamp as his eternally bemused lucid self He would have been a very interesting man to meet I really enjoyed hearing in his own words how he thought about his own art and found him to be strong in his own opinions but really not caring much at all about how others saw or felt about himRefreshing and uite different in some cases in regard to his art and what his intentions were or were notcompared to some of the things I have read written about him and his work Interviewed by someone that knows enough to make the conversations worthwhile This interview conducted the ear before his death finds Duchamp confident bemused and thoughtful his precise and reserved wit occasionally pierces through the facts asked after and indifferently produced There is also a cute moment when Duchamp mentions Robert Motherwell editor of this edition and the Documents of 20th Century Art series and how he makes his money easily in reply footnote 13 reads Ed But all that is mythical and uncontrollable about Duchamp s work is hard to find here though the singularity of it does come throug. H art as transportation No end is in view in this fragment of a new perspective 'In the end ou lose interest
so I didn't feel the necessity to finish it'He declared that he wanted to kill art 'for myself' I didn't feel the necessity to finish it'He declared that he wanted to kill art 'for myself' his persistent attempts to destroy frames of reference altered our thinking established new units of thought 'a new thought for that object'The art community feels Duchamp's presence and his absence He has changed the condition of being here Jasper Johns from Marcel Duchamp An Appreciati. ,
One handy to Google the obscure artists he references and their works If only we could ask him about the many changes in art since his death in 1968 I m sure he would have a lot to say about it not all of it kind Of course the book is very topic specific and will not necessarily interest everyone but those who are interested in Duchamp and his work this is a wonderful beginning The chronology at the end provides a great summary of everything he did and went through in his life but the text itself provides so much valuable background information and a real insight into his mind his thoughts the impetus behind his work The dialogues are actually dialogues natural and easy to follow Marcel Duchamp never read Proust He did not get to know Malraux Just watched a Godard movie Masculin F mininHowever its concept of cinema as an artistic expression I consider it from the point of view very interesting Their eschatological view of death seemed to be a bit vague in *Fact Like All Opinions About *like all opinions about salvation He speaks of theatre which is a hypothesis to explore as indeed others of his interestThere is a theme to explore in this book firstly and in particular The phenomenon Dada never interested me deeply I consider. Ting He allowed perhaps encouraged the attendant mythology One thought of his decision his willing this stopping Yet on one occasion he said it was not like that He spoke of breaking a leg 'You don't mean to do it' he saidThe Large like that He spoke of breaking a leg 'You don't mean to do it' he saidThe Large A greenhouse for his intuition Erotic machinery the Bride held in a see through cage 'a Hilarious Picture' Its cross references of sight and thought the changing focus of the eyes and mind give fresh sense to the time and space we occupy negate any concern wit. .
Duchamp is the greatest artist in the 20th Century And this book is a fascinating conversation between the artist and Pierre Cabanne about his work and fascinating conversation between the artist and Pierre Cabanne about his work and aesthetic Very much an essential read with respect to 20th Century art practices I enjoyed this book very much An interview with one of the century s most brilliant minds about his work and his past which is also a past of major parts in modern art that wouldn t be the same without "him A man with endless curiosity on new stuff but short " A man with endless curiosity on new stuff but short on existing ones A man having many principles but promoting non principles A man hating monotonicity but living an unexciting life A man disliking judgment but behaving on likeness A man full of contradiction but seeing no conflicts Some words he used a lot are amusing indifference monotonous and finished This was excellent Literary time travel Conversations with the past Filled with amusing ideas and with keen idiosyncratic insights Akin to a bowl of talking soup Or maybe an electric umbrella It struck me how often Duchamp said that he found something amusing His ethos seems to boil down to curiosity and amusement and less about the big uestions And perhaps that s how it should be I found it useful to have my iPh. With an introduction by Robert Motherwell and an appreciation by Jasper JohnsMarcel Duchamp one of this century's pioneer artists moved his work through the retinal boundaries which had been established with Impressionism into a field where language thought and vision act upon one another There it changed form through a complex interplay of new mental and physical materials heralding many of the technical mental and visual details to be found in recent art In the 1920s Duchamp gave up uit pain.