Ns without knowing a eg Fermat s
theorem before the proof and to what a before the proof and what a is There are also interesting remarks around nonconstructive existence proofs and how starkly less clear they are in their meaning than constructive ones Wittgenstein considers as an example uestions about whether or not the string 777 occurs in particular irrational numbers and what it means to say that 777 oes not occur in the infinite Double Action Deputy (Cardwell Ranch: Montana Legacy Book 4) decimal expansion of an irrational number I can t give a rating to a book in which Ion t understand most of the content There
definitely food for thought I ll have to back to it when I can better understand the topics and engage to a respectable level still in progress I gave this five stars even though I m pretty sure I on t understand it I m reasonably sure that nobody understand Wittgenstein but that s another story Nonetheless the book provides a wealth of brain food for thinking about issues in the philosophy of math and logic and gives obscure but invaluable insights into Wittgenstein s takes on such matter. Contradiction; the role of mathematical propositions in the forming of conceptsTranslator's NoteEditors' PrefaceThe TextInd.
S DEFINITELY FOOD FOR THOUGHT I LL HAVE TO
Summary Õ PDF, DOC, TXT or eBook ¹ Ludwig WittgensteinTed correctly and are not empirical statements or statements giving knowledge Wittgenstein is irectly against Russell in that he Academia Nuts did not believe mathematics reuired a rigorous foundation and takes aim at the idea that the real proof of an arithmetical statement is the one found in a system such as Russell s PM One of the reasons for this is that PM or another foundational calculus cannot be considered the ground of 224 as one of the criteria someone would look for in a potential foundation is that it would have to prove statements like 224 Russell s PM would have been rejected if it had proved statements like 225 There are some interestingiscussions about Godel Cantor and Dedekind Wittgenstein tends to be attacked for his comments on these mathematicians although Wittgenstein isn t isputing the proofs themselves it s the interpretation they re given and the significance they hold and the unusual statements that people make in connection with them There is
Some Interesting Discussion On Whether Or Not You Understand Mathematicalinteresting iscussion on whether or not you understand mathematical Rise iscovery invention; Russell's logic Godel's theorem cantor's iagonal procedure Dedekind's cuts; the nature of proof. ,
Re reading material great for public communication each point a Afghani and 'AbduhAn Essay on Religious Unbelief and Political Activism in Modern Islam different riddle this is where Nassim Taleb took Wittgenstein s ruler from points 94 and 93 This book contains comments written over aecade of work of Wittgenstein A large part of the text was originally supposed to be the second half of the Philosophical Investigations and there are lots of themes in common what it means to follow a rule for example I would only recommend reading it if you are already familiar with the later Wittgenstein s philosophy in general as parts of
This Book Are Difficultbook are Rehab Doesnt Work - Ibogaine Does difficult interpret if you were to read it without understanding Wittgenstein s broader aims The collection of remarks was never formulated into a fully cohesive book and much of the comments were just Wittgenstein s comments to himself so some parts were repetitive and other parts withoutevelopment That said there are plenty of interesting ideas For example Wittgenstein that basic arithmetical statements such as 32 5 are used as rules or criteria to ITS NOT YOUR FAULT determine whether someone has calcula. This analyzes inepth topics logical compulsion mathematical conviction; calculation as experiment; mathematical surp. ,